Guidelines for Reviewers
Guidelines For Reviewers
Blind peer review plays an important role to improve the quality of research papers. Following guidelines for reviewers are recommended while reviewing the articles:
A reviewer should judge, assess and evaluate the weaknesses and strengths of the paper(s) sent to him/her.
Reviewers must keep all the information of the paper(s) confidential and will not share with anyone.
Reviewers must avoid criticism on social, political and religious basis. Criticism must be according to academic and technical grounds.
Reviewers are encouraged to give their feedback concisely, objectively, relevantly and constructively to improve the quality of manuscripts.
If reviewer(s) seek material copied from any other source without citation they should inform the editor of the journal with relevant citations and references.
Reviewers are encouraged to provide feedback and return reports within two weeks.
Blind peer review plays an important role to improve the quality of research papers. Following guidelines for reviewers are recommended while reviewing the articles:
A reviewer should judge, assess and evaluate the weaknesses and strengths of the paper(s) sent to him/her.
Reviewers must keep all the information of the paper(s) confidential and will not share with anyone.
Reviewers must avoid criticism on social, political and religious basis. Criticism must be according to academic and technical grounds.
Reviewers are encouraged to give their feedback concisely, objectively, relevantly and constructively to improve the quality of manuscripts.
If reviewer(s) seek material copied from any other source without citation they should inform the editor of the journal with relevant citations and references.
Reviewers are encouraged to provide feedback and return reports within two weeks.